Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
2.
3.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine ; 283(3):199-202, 2022.
Article in Japanese | Ichushi | ID: covidwho-2122018
4.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 2022 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1995999

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 omicron variant has a low affinity for the lower respiratory tract. However, upper respiratory tract symptoms, such as nasal discharge and sore throat, characterize the infection with this variant. Therefore, in laryngeal stenosis, disease severity assessment through blood oxygen saturation has not been useful. METHODS: We report the case of "omicron laryngitis" in a 59-year-old male who visited the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic with complaints of a sore throat and difficulty in swallowing saliva that persisted for a day. RESULTS: Laryngoscopy revealed severe swelling of the transglottic region and exudates on the larynx. He was then diagnosed with COVID-19 and subjected to emergency tracheostomy for airway management. Until the emergence of the omicron variant, COVID-19 showed mainly lower airway and mild upper airway inflammatory features. However, upper airway stenosis should be suspected in cases presenting with "muffled speech," "dysphagia," "severe pain on swallowing," and "inspiratory dyspnea or stridor." CONCLUSION: Therefore, laryngeal and pharyngeal evaluation using a flexible laryngoscope under appropriate infection control measures is necessary, considering the possibility of progression to fatal laryngeal stenosis, as noted in this case.

5.
Brain Nerve ; 74(7): 911-915, 2022 Jul.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954947

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has placed a heavy burden on healthcare workers. We conducted a burnout survey in three hospitals designated as COVID-19 priority hospitals in Tokyo during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Japanese Burnout Scale showed higher values than the existing survey of physicians. In particular, burnout is caused by a "lack of motivation" due to the inability to provide general medical services. Based on this survey, we discuss the burnout experienced by physicians during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Physicians , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 48(6): 1176-1180, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1281384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In Japan, many otolaryngologists provide primary care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of otorhinolaryngological findings in order to improve COVID-19 diagnostic systems in a primary care setting. METHODS: A total of 351 patients (mean age, 36.0 ± 15.4 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 by otolaryngologists who belong to the Japan Otorhinolaryngologists Association were included in the study. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect information regarding the timing of positive identification of COVID-19, the route of infection, symptoms, and findings in the tonsils, nasal cavity, pharynx, ear, and neck. A modified Centor score was calculated for cases in which age, symptoms, and tonsil and neck findings were described. RESULTS: Symptoms included fever (56%), olfactory disturbance (46%), and a sore throat (56%). Of the individuals considered, 63% had ordinary rhinoscopic findings, 21% experienced watery rhinorrhea, and 12% had observable mucosal redness. Further, 87% had ordinary tonsillar findings, 13% displayed tonsillar redness, with enlargement and white mucus observe in 2% and 1% of participants, respectively. A total of 193 patients had a calculated Centor score of 3 points in 2%, and scores of the remaining participants were ≤2 points. CONCLUSION: Of all patients considered, 40% had nasal findings and 4% had purulent nasal discharge. In contrast, only 13% of the patients had tonsillar findings, and no patients had Centor scores ≥4 points. Symptom differentiation from that of bacterial infections is difficult. In areas where COVID-19 is prevalent, the disease should be considered in patients presenting with fever, olfactory disturbances, and sore throat with minimal or no clinical findings in the nasal cavity and pharynx.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/diagnosis , Symptom Assessment , Adult , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Otolaryngologists , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/epidemiology , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/virology
8.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 48(3): 525-529, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1014322

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Involvement in the tracheostomy procedure for COVID-19 patients can lead to a feeling of fear in medical staff. To address concerns over infection, we gathered and analyzed experiences with tracheostomy in the COVID-19 patient population from all over Japan. METHODS: The data for health-care workers involved in tracheostomies for COVID-19-infected patients were gathered from academic medical centers or their affiliated hospitals from all over Japan. RESULTS: Tracheostomies have been performed in 35 COVID-19 patients with a total of 91 surgeons, 49 anesthesiologists, and 49 surgical staff members involved. Twenty-eight (80%) patients underwent surgery more than 22 days after the development of COVID-19-related symptoms (11: 22-28 days and 17: ≥29 days). Thirty (85.7%) patients underwent surgery ≥ 15 days after intubation (14: 15-21 days, 6: 22-28 days, and 10: ≥29 days). Among the total of 189 health-care workers involved in the tracheostomy procedures, 25 used a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) and 164 used a N95 mask and eye protection. As a result, no transmission to staff occurred during the 2 weeks of follow-up after surgery. CONCLUSION: No one involved in tracheostomy procedures were found to have been infected with COVID-19 in this Japanese study. The reason is thought to be that the timing of the surgery was quite late after the infections, and the surgery was performed using appropriate PPE and surgical procedure. The indications for and timing of tracheostomy for severe COVID-19 patients should be decided through multidisciplinary discussion.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Tracheostomy/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Eye Protective Devices , Health Personnel , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Japan , N95 Respirators , Patient Isolators , Personal Protective Equipment , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Protective Devices , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 47(5): 715-726, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-664236

ABSTRACT

On April 14, the Society of Swallowing and Dysphagia of Japan (SSDJ) proposed its position statement on dysphagia treatment considering the ongoing spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The main routes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are physical contact with infected persons and exposure to respiratory droplets. In cases of infection, the nasal cavity and nasopharynx have the highest viral load in the body. Swallowing occurs in the oral cavity and pharynx, which correspond to the sites of viral proliferation. In addition, the possibility of infection by aerosol transmission is also concerning. Dysphagia treatment includes a broad range of clinical assessments and examinations, dysphagia rehabilitation, oral care, nursing care, and surgical treatments. Any of these can lead to the production of droplets and aerosols, as well as contact with viral particles. In terms of proper infection control measures, all healthcare professionals involved in dysphagia treatment must be fully briefed and must appropriately implement all measures. In addition, most patients with dysphagia should be considered to be at a higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19 because they are elderly and have complications including heart diseases, diabetes, respiratory diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases. This statement establishes three regional categories according to the status of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Accordingly, the SSDJ proposes specific infection countermeasures that should be implemented considering 1) the current status of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the region, 2) the patient status of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 3) whether the examinations or procedures conducted correspond to aerosol-generating procedures, depending on the status of dysphagia treatment. This statement is arranged into separate sections providing information and advice in consideration of the COVID-19 outbreak, including "terminology", "clinical swallowing assessment and examination", "swallowing therapy", "oral care", "surgical procedure for dysphagia", "tracheotomy care", and "nursing care". In areas where SARS-CoV-2 infection is widespread, sufficient personal protective equipment should be used when performing aerosol generation procedures. The current set of statements on dysphagia management in the COVID-19 outbreak is not an evidence-based clinical practice guideline, but a guide for all healthcare workers involved in the treatment of dysphagia during the COVID-19 epidemic to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/nursing , Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Humans , Japan , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheostomy/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL